Showing posts with label Opinions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinions. Show all posts

Friday, 29 October 2010

Non-paying residents at receiving end

By THO XIN YI thoxinyi@thestar.com.my

Subscription to security schemes in residential areas often cause dispute among paying and non-paying residents.
While those who disagree with the schemes maintain that they have the freedom of choice, the rest think the former are taking advantage of those who contribute to the monthly fees.
A resident in Bukit Rahman Putra 7, Sungai Buloh, who stopped subscribing to the security services, was unhappy that the residents association put up two banners that read “Do not live on the charity of your neighbour. Please pay your share to protect your family”.
“No one can insult or humiliate us. We have equal rights to stay here without prejudice, shame and fear as the rest of the paying residents,” she said.
The resident spoke strongly against the action of putting up the tri-lingual banners at the guardhouse to embarrass the non-paying residents.
“It does not promote harmony within the neighbourhood and I certainly do not live on my neighbours’ charity,” she said.






 Do your part: Bukit Rahman Putra 7 Residents Association chairman K.S. Ooi said this banner was put up to create awareness and encourage the residents to join the security scheme and not to humiliate them. – By THO XIN YI/The Star
The resident said she opted to drop out from the scheme as she was dissatisfied with the services provided by the security company.
She pointed out that a neighbouring residential area, Bukit Rahman Putra 6, also has a similar banner put up near its guardhouse.
When contacted, residents association chairman K.S. Ooi said the intention of putting up the banners was not to embarrass the residents and was not targeted at anyone in particular.
“It’s a general banner to create awareness and encourage the residents to join the security scheme,” he said.
He added that the fees charged by the security companies increased when the government stopped them from employing foreign guards.
“The residents association faced the plight when there is insufficient subscription to pay for the fees.
“Some residents take the security services for granted as it is paid for by other residents,” he said.
Ooi said he was upset over the sole complaint by the resident.
He added that out of the 348 houses, about 220 were participating members.
“Last year, two or three burglaries happened fortnightly. We are having the security service for the benefit of all,” he said.
Over in Taman Mutiara Puchong, the residents association face a problem of non-paying members and visitors hitting the boom gates to enter or exit the neighbourhood.
The association has to fork out RM600 every time the boom gate was hit, and it has happened more than 10 times.
Gerard Lim, a association committee member, said they had lodged police report and even took the matter to the magistrate court.
In a residents association meeting, it was decided that the signs that read “You Bang You Pay” to be displayed on the boom gates to stop the stubborn ones from hitting the bar again.
The method has proven effective as no other incident happened since then.
“The paying residents are given access cards to raise the automatic boom gates, while non-paying residents and visitors have to register at the guardhouse every time they want to enter the neighbourhood.
“It is not fair to 80% of the residents to pay for the non-paying ones.
“Our guards take care of the common area, such as the field, where children gather and play,” Lim said.

source: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2010/10/29/central/7309795&sec=central

Tuesday, 12 October 2010

Letter to RADA

Hello,

I would like to thank the pro-tem committee for a job well done! It’s a good start, we can work on further improvement, other issues and details later on.

I appreciate representatives going round to collect the monthly fees from residents. However, since we are not always at home, we don’t mind dropping the check into the letter box of one of the representatives. May I suggest that you publicize this in the blog? Or reply to me with this info? Thanks!

Also, to encourage more residents to participate in this security project, may I suggest that the blog also list all the houses in Tmn Desa Aman,  and indicate which are the ones participating (i.e. paying fees) in the project?

Thanks!

Rgds,
Gan SL  

Oct 7
..............................................................................

Dear Dr Gan,

Thanks for your support and encouragement.

In fact we received calls from residents on fee collecting suggestions:
1. To pay quarterly.
2. Online payment.
3. Permanent mailbox or location for payment.

We propose the following:
1. For November, we shall collect 2 months payment (Nov & Dec 2010). Thereafter quarterly payment from January 2011 onwards.
2. Online payment: our registration still in progress. Before this we can't open own bank account hence this option has to defer.
3. Permanent mail box/location for payment: Currently you can drop your cheque to the following address:
    a) 22 Jalan 10 (En. Hassan - Chairman)
    b) 6 Jalan 8 (Mr. Kor - Secretary)
    c) 47 jalan 10 (Mr. Ch'ng - Treasurer)
Note: Only Cheque or Postal Order. Don't drop Cash!

On your suggestion of listing all house that participating in this project, yes we will, but would be at end of this month as we are trying to push more participants.

best regards,
Ch'ng Soo Yang
Pro-tem Treasurer

Some Q&A

Q: Why we having female guards? some guards looks young age too.
A: Due to the short notice given to security company, we are actually having some local guards temporarily. Some guards will be replaced once the right guards are recruited. We are planning a mixed of 3 foreign: 1 local mix initially. The local guards are more experienced and will guide the new guards.

Q: When will we have car stickers?
A: Due to the machine breakdown of original printer, we have changed the printer company. The car stckers will be available starting end of this week. For those members that have not submitting your car plate numbers, please contact your representatives or committee members.

Q: Why RADA haven't come to collect our fees?
A: Due to initial difficulties and more time spent to explain Security system, most of our representatives are short of manpower to cover every house. As most representatives have full time work and only can allocate some spare time to help our Taman community, please be initiative and help them by calling them to collect, instead of ask them to knock every house at evening or weekend.

Q: What happened to Jalan 9's gate?
A: It was knocked down by a careless lorry driver. Compensation has been made to us, but repair work would take longer time as we are redesigning the gate.

Q: How was the response of collection so far?
A: Out of about 280 occupied houses, we have collected 80% (220 houses).  (Note: total houses in our Taman = 350 but many are unoccupied or rented). As we still collecting the remaining few, the final figure would be available by end of the month.

Q: Why some are paying less?
A: We classified the full paying houses as "member", while those paying below full fee, as "contributor". Those paying less mainly due to poor financial status, or contributions from tenants/outsiders. Only member will be given House Plate, where the security guards will pay attention to their house. No obligation for the guards to check the non-member house even it could be a break-in or rob case.

Q: Would it be possible to reduce monthly fee of RM70?
A: Yes it is possible. Currently the fees collected are used to pay security company (90%), gates and guard houses (30%), car stickers and house plates (20%) and stationery, still a bit short of fund. If we could collect all full fee from at least 250 houses, the fee could be reduced in January 2011 onwards.

Tuesday, 14 September 2010

求平安要自費

林風

罪案高居不下,警方指人力不足,平民百姓為求自保,對於圍籬保安措施的開銷須自費感到不以為然。

偷、搶罪案黑區的城市花園住宅區,早已出現收費巡邏的新行業。

最令人懷念的是70至80年代由政府實施的「睦鄰計劃」。每家各派出一名成員輪流在保安亭守夜或三五成群手執「警棍」巡邏,發揮各民族守望相助的睦鄰精神,值得政府重新實施,特別是在種族親善和諧被極端份子挑撥的現階段,睦鄰加上保安的意義更加重大。

房屋地方政府部應制定保安社區指南,避免公共道路或進出口受到圍籬影響;其中保安社區的設立須得到51%以上居民同意,若49%的人不付費而享有「保安」利益,對絕大多數須付費的人有欠公平,且要承擔更大的金錢負擔。

圍籬社區及保安社區,如公寓住戶一樣,必須承擔一筆「保安」費,因此增加了一般花園住宅區平民的額外開銷;在百物騰漲,生活指數高攀的階段,無異是雪上加霜。

擁有10萬成員大馬警隊,近二三年來福利、待遇大幅度改善,卻與飆高罪案率不成正比,民調更顯示,警隊的滿意度低落。

身為平民百姓,我們有納稅的義務,同樣享有性命財產受保護的權利。原本保安工作是警方的任務和責任,然而,警隊在維護治安上的表現無法令人滿意,從一部份百姓不得不自掏腰包,付託保安公司「保平安」,可以看出人民對警方感到失望與無奈。

如今「設計」圍籬社區與保安社區,在很大程度上是為了要輔助警隊的工作,讓平民百姓花錢,自費「買」平安,但卻增添對警隊的負面形象,得不償失。
新警察總長走馬上任,通常都有「新官上任三把火」的傳統作為,最為引人美談的沙烈警察總長頒布的「沙烈巡邏」制度,抑低罪案率相當成功,可惜後繼不願蕭規曹隨,又缺乏更好制度取代,使警隊聲譽「蒙塵」。

願新任警察總長不要讓平民百姓「自費買平安」,讓他們感受太沉重!

东方新闻网
[source: http://www2.orientaldaily.com.my/dread/DGF/26Om0qFl1W3v0P990Q7490o01hae4Mj6 ]