Tuesday, 14 September 2010

拼治安區:八打靈再也美陽鎮

治安問題:
●光天化日下破門行竊
●一群電單車黨匪聯手向獨自行駛的電單車騎士下手
●持刀闖入店舖搶劫,倒霉的店主又禍不單行,於兩週後發生住家破門行竊案

(雪蘭莪‧八打靈再也)八打靈美陽鎮住宅區頻頻發生罪案,凌晨出門的小販接二連三地成為電單車掠奪匪的“目標”。

據居民指出,一批為數約6人的電單車掠奪匪,最近常向凌晨出門的小販下手。

此地區於愚人節當天凌晨6時許,也發生一起啼笑皆非的搶劫案。電單車掠奪匪在洗劫受害者後,竟向受害者道謝。

當天,這名糕點女小販於凌晨獨自騎電單車出門時,遭一批電單車掠奪匪打搶。小販見對方人多勢,唯有乖乖就範,任由掠奪匪從她後褲袋掏走錢包。

打搶後還說謝謝

令小販哭笑不得的是,掠奪匪先“調戲”叫她“Ah Moi”(阿妹)之後,可能因為輕易得手而心情大好,不只向女小販說聲“謝謝”,還順應她的要求,歸還錢包內的身份證及駕駛執照,好讓她免除更新各種重要證件的煩人手續。

3天後,案件又在當地重演。一名中年男性小販,獨自騎著電單車時,被電單車掠奪匪搶劫,但他沒有勇氣向掠奪匪討回身份證及駕駛執照。這名男小販事後也向警方報案,但上述女小販則沒有投報。

搶車不遂擄走男車主

除此以外,此地區也曾發生一宗更嚴重的案件。搶車黨在民宅前搶車不遂,相信是被受害者的妻子放聲高喊所惹怒,竟擄走男車主,然後再通過電話要求其妻子“以車換人”,根本不把法律放在眼裡。

居協建議聘保安設圍籬

調查問卷居民反應冷淡
為解決層出不窮的各種罪案問題,美陽鎮居民協會從多年前已不斷向居民提出裝置社區圍籬與聘請保安隊的建議,甚至分別於去年10月及今年3月間發出兩次“保安服務調查問卷”,奈何居民的反應相當冷淡,以致迄今仍未加強保安措施。

因此,該居協將於今年5月開會及安排兩三個隊伍沿家挨戶進行訪問,更積極的收集民意及有關調查問卷。

據瞭解,美陽鎮住宅區約建有1000個單位的住家,其中Lily&Rose公寓約有400個單位,其餘600個單位是單層與雙層排屋。

八打靈再也居民聯合會兼美陽鎮居民協會主席廖威鳴也特別安排了多位居民向《大都會》記者現身說法,敘述當地治安嚴重敗壞的情況,希望獲得警方的關注。

黃健勇(59歲,居民):盼設保安隊與社區圍籬
“美陽鎮鄰近的白沙羅再也、美嘉園與SS23區都有保安巡邏隊,偏偏美陽鎮就沒有,我們希望早日能夠設立保安隊伍與社區圍籬。

我鄰家在4月23日下午4時30分被賊徒破門行竊,我出門時還沒看到甚麼異狀,回家後才知道鄰家的邊窗被撬開和被人潛入了。

賊徒很選擇性地進行偷竊,他們取走了LCD電視、名錶和名貴包包,其他的迷你收音機和音樂系統則未取走。相信幹案的有兩人,並以轎車來‘搬貨’,屋主事後已報警。”

何乾良(60歲,炒麵小販):被飆車黨拿走錢包
“4月4日(週六)清晨6時20分,我騎著電單車到巴剎採購蔬菜,結果在26/2路(美嘉花園居協會所前)過了交通燈後,被大約5、6輛飆車黨匪從後追上。

看到他們人多勢眾,我只有停下電單車,還對他們說“Saya tak ada wang”(我沒有錢),其中一人就把手探入我右邊的褲袋,取走了我的錢包,我不敢向他們討回身上的錢。我錢包只有百多令吉,這是我第一次遇劫。”

江金英(52歲,賣糕點小販):清早騎電單車被打搶
“4月1日清早6時許,我獨自一人騎電單車到千百家新村拿貨,結果在靠近林國榮學院的7-11連鎖店的轉彎處,被人叫了一聲‘Ah Mooi’。

我轉頭一看,已經有6輛電單車停在我面前,我愕住了,坐在電單車上,其中一人從我後褲掏出錢包,還說“Thank you”。

當時我用馬來話,向他要求拿回身份證,沒想到他竟然給回我。

曾聽說電單車掠奪匪的事件,沒想到自己會成為受害者,而且一般早上有很多人去7-11連鎖店拿免費報紙,沒想到那天路上一個人影都沒有。

我不敢放聲高喊,因為曾聽聞有一名印裔婦女遇劫時,身上只有4令吉,又沒手機,結果被心有不甘的匪徒用鎖匙刮傷臉。”

廖威鳴(八打靈再也居民聯合會兼美陽鎮居民協會主席):盼居民合作團結
“居民不合作的態度令居協非常頭痛。居協曾在去年10月及今年3月,各別發出1000份調查問卷給居民,詢問他們是否願意每個月繳付介於20令吉至30令吉流動保安服務費,可是反應非常冷淡。

第一次,居協只收回了60張問卷,第二次截至3月31日為止,僅收回了7張問卷,其他已發出的問卷不知所終。

有些居民會說:“我的家都沒東西給他(匪徒)偷”,一旦家裡進賊,他們才會說“我的家全部東西都被翻箱倒篋了”。我誠心希望居民能夠合作,不要抱持愛理不理的態度,因為只有取得大家的合作,我們才能團結一致,共同撲滅罪案。”

星洲日報/大都會‧2009.04.30

求平安要自費

林風

罪案高居不下,警方指人力不足,平民百姓為求自保,對於圍籬保安措施的開銷須自費感到不以為然。

偷、搶罪案黑區的城市花園住宅區,早已出現收費巡邏的新行業。

最令人懷念的是70至80年代由政府實施的「睦鄰計劃」。每家各派出一名成員輪流在保安亭守夜或三五成群手執「警棍」巡邏,發揮各民族守望相助的睦鄰精神,值得政府重新實施,特別是在種族親善和諧被極端份子挑撥的現階段,睦鄰加上保安的意義更加重大。

房屋地方政府部應制定保安社區指南,避免公共道路或進出口受到圍籬影響;其中保安社區的設立須得到51%以上居民同意,若49%的人不付費而享有「保安」利益,對絕大多數須付費的人有欠公平,且要承擔更大的金錢負擔。

圍籬社區及保安社區,如公寓住戶一樣,必須承擔一筆「保安」費,因此增加了一般花園住宅區平民的額外開銷;在百物騰漲,生活指數高攀的階段,無異是雪上加霜。

擁有10萬成員大馬警隊,近二三年來福利、待遇大幅度改善,卻與飆高罪案率不成正比,民調更顯示,警隊的滿意度低落。

身為平民百姓,我們有納稅的義務,同樣享有性命財產受保護的權利。原本保安工作是警方的任務和責任,然而,警隊在維護治安上的表現無法令人滿意,從一部份百姓不得不自掏腰包,付託保安公司「保平安」,可以看出人民對警方感到失望與無奈。

如今「設計」圍籬社區與保安社區,在很大程度上是為了要輔助警隊的工作,讓平民百姓花錢,自費「買」平安,但卻增添對警隊的負面形象,得不償失。
新警察總長走馬上任,通常都有「新官上任三把火」的傳統作為,最為引人美談的沙烈警察總長頒布的「沙烈巡邏」制度,抑低罪案率相當成功,可惜後繼不願蕭規曹隨,又缺乏更好制度取代,使警隊聲譽「蒙塵」。

願新任警察總長不要讓平民百姓「自費買平安」,讓他們感受太沉重!

东方新闻网
[source: http://www2.orientaldaily.com.my/dread/DGF/26Om0qFl1W3v0P990Q7490o01hae4Mj6 ]

Thursday, 9 September 2010

曹智雄:新房屋发展计划 保安围篱社区须呈图测

二零一零年九月九日 凌晨十二时四十五分

(白沙罗8日讯)房屋及地方政府部长拿督曹智雄表示,新的房屋发展计划必须依据“保安围篱社区”和“保安社区”指南向县市议会提呈图测或建议书,现有住宅区的围篱和保安计划只要没有引发他人不便,便可继续。

不过,他提到一旦接获投诉,有关当局将在调查后决定是否需要拆除。

他举例,甲洞百美园的“保安社区”计划封锁几条通道,导致临近居民丧失使用有关通道的权力。

“‘保安围篱社区’没有大问题,因为围篱的范围属于私人的,可是鉴于住宅区的通道和其他设施都属于公众的,所以推行‘保安社区’计划时必须顾及其他公众的感受。”

他补充,由于“保安社区”计划涉及月费,因此他表示各个住宅区必须获得至少51%居民通过才可推行这项计划。

他周三在部门召开记者会指出,有关指南今年7月28日获得内阁及本月2日召开的地方政府国家理事会的通过。

他说,“1985年分层地契法令”2007年修正后,允许住宅计划的土地分为小地块,以分层地契方式拥有土地,促使屋主通过发管理机构处理发展计划。

然而,为了居民的安全而在住宅区围篱的计划称为“保安围篱社区”。至于没有管制的“保安社区”计划引发同区域居民的不便,当中包括主要入口处设立保安亭、在共用公路安闸门、建链环围栏,以及要求公众在移交身份证明才能通关等。

曹智雄表示,“保安围篱社区”被诠释为在高层屋业如公寓、联排别墅或拥有土地的独立式洋房、排屋或半独立式洋房,一群居民同住在一个被篱笆围住的住宅区,可是在大马,它则被诠释为住在同一拥有土地地区的一群居民或社区由居民分层拥有。

他称,“保安社区”的存在并不受到任何一条法律约束,它只需要获得当地居民的同意即可。

“保安社区指南”涉及一般控制计划、设立条件、保安亭建设限制、 围栏建设限制、保安人员的条件及释放地位的条件6元素,在落实“保安社区”之前必须通过居协向地方政府注册、必须获得绝大部份居民的同意、聘雇的保安人员必须向内政部登记等。

保安围篱社区指南

一般规划管制条款如下:

1.只有特定地点及限定在市区内才能实行;
2.计划必须纳入发展布局规划;
3.计划的最低面积为1公顷、最高面积为10公顷;
4.分权共有财产设备包括计划中涉及的道路属于社区房屋计划,由居民委任的管理机构协调;
5.不允许建墙或篱笆分割”保安围篱社区”或“非保安围篱社区”;
6.执行前需进行社会评估影响(SIA)。

特定条款如下:

1.每项计划的发展面积大小必须介于1公顷至10公顷之间,或200至500个住宅单位;
2.地段规划必须符合发展商拟定的房屋指南;
3.落实地点必须是在城市高罪案率的地区(依据皇家警察部队的纪录);
4.道路和等级制度-计划中的地区与计划外的地区必须要有一条直路衔接,以及准备两条紧急进出通道;
5.住宅设计和建筑位置必须符合安全性;
6.篱笆或墙不能高于2.75公尺(9英尺);
7.至少要有两条进出通道;
8.保安亭不能阻挡道路,面积不能超过1.8公尺(X)2.4公尺;
9.景观和数目的栽种不能高于篱笆及太过灌木;
10.拥有土地房屋的高度最高只能达8.5公尺;
11.访客的摩托车及轿车车位必须充足;
12.需保留至少宽2.5公尺电、电话、水供、天然气和污水系统特殊通道;
13.安置公共设施限定俱乐部、游乐场、休闲区或泳池;
14.社区必须以地名或大马文化特徵取名。

source: http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2010/09/09/32.html

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Gated schemes allowed if 51% of residents agree

Published: Wednesday September 8, 2010 MYT 4:51:00 PM  [TheStar]

KUALA LUMPUR: A gated neighbourhood can only be set up with the approval of 51% of the residents, said Housing and Local Government Minister Datuk Chor Chee Heung.

He said perimeter fencing and guard houses would not be allowed to be built under the new guidelines for gated and guarded neighbourhood schemes.

He said the local authorities have the right to tear down the fencing and guard houses which caused inconvenience to residents.

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin recently said the guidelines - which were approved and endorsed by the National Council for Local Government - would be imposed with immediate effect on new applications.

Existing gated communities and guarded neighbourhood schemes are exempted.

source: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2010/9/8/nation/20100908165425&sec=nation

Taman Desa Aman: CAR STOLEN!!

This morning (8th September 2010) duirng 12am - 6am, one brown color Wira was stolen. The car was parked at the backlane of Jalan Desa Aman 9 shophouses, while owner is rented a room at 2rd floor of printing firm. Owner has made a police report.


Please be alert all Taman Desa Aman residents. Remember to park your car at bright area and lock it properly.


Also watch out for any strangers that enter our Taman. Inform police or sms to us if you suspect anything.

Security Guards: vendor scorecard

As we are currently asking vendor for a second (better) quotation, we dont publish their rate here. The final quotations will be updated here with our comments/selection criteria.

Monday, 30 August 2010

How do we come out with estimated fee?


Remember: The more participating hosues, the lower the cost!
Please refer "maps" (menu bar) for proposed gate & fences.

Gated and guarded communities must not have objects obstructing firemen

Star Metro, Tuesday August 24, 2010
By CHARLES FERNANDEZ


RESIDENTS associations are setting up gated and guarded communities and the Fire and Rescue Services Department has no problems with it as long as they are not a hindrance in the event of an emergency.


There are no ministry guidelines on such schemes and the rules and regulations differ from one local government to another.


However last month, a set of guidelines were drafted to plan, control and monitor the development of gated and guarded communities by the Housing and Local Government Ministry.


The guidelines were drawn by the Urban and Rural Planning Department and the Cabinet is considering enforcing the guidelines throughout Peninsular Malaysia. The draft would include detailed aspects of planning and monitoring of gated community schemes in line with the Strata Titles Act 1985 (Amendment 2006) as well as for “guarded neighbourhoods”.


In the meantime, the government will not stop anyone from creating a gated community with guards but once the draft is in place, such schemes would have to follow conditions and regulations stipulated by the ministry.


Fire and Rescue Department Malaysia (Inspectorate Unit, Corporate Management and PR Division Senior) Superintendent II, Gan Hock Seong said the department had no objections but it would help if the residents associations discussed plans with the department before setting up such schemes.


He said now the discussion was with the developers but there were certain problems in gated communities that could hinder the department from carrying out their jobs in the event of a fire.


Gan said for example, the erection of boom gates and horizontal bars might cause a problem if they were not built to specifications as the recommended height is 16ft to allow their biggest vehicle to pass through.


“In such instances we can use our hydraulic tools to remove them but we could have responded faster if there were no such hindrances,’’ he added.


Gan said gated and guarded communities were something new and although there were no guidelines set by the Fire and Rescue Department, the residents associations could work with them to follow simple guidelines for a win-win situation.


In Selangor, for instance, 85% of the residents must agree for a guarded neighbourhood whereas a gated community needs 100%.


“This would help the department to reduce the loss of response time as obstacles and other hindrances could cause big losses in the event of a major fire,’’ said Gan.


He said although the department was equipped with the tools to remove obstacles such as boom gates, in most cases narrow access roads and security booths in old developments, which were not built to specifications, obstructed vehicle movement.


“In the event of a fire at high-rise buildings, the department would use the sky-lift and it would pose problems if the access roads are not wide enough,’’ said Gan.


Such schemes, he said, should not hinder vehicles from entering the area by putting up barricades and obstructions that were critical to response time.


Gan said under such circumstances, the department could issue the fire-hazard abatement notice under Section 8 of the Fire and Rescue Act to absolve them of any damages caused by the delay.


He said new developments were required to be designed with the minimum hazard or risks and this was provided for under the Uniform Building By-laws.


http://usj18.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/gated-and-guarded-communities-must-not-have-objects-obstructing-firemen/

Sunday, 29 August 2010

Proposed Fences


The length of fence covers over 1000 meters length started from Jalan 9 entrance (near kindergarten) and all the ways along Jalan 12/Persiaran Desa Aman until Jalan Desa Aman 4, and continue to temple border, also covers open areas along Jalan 3. Optional small gates is proposed for Jalan 4 and Jalan 3 where the gate will be opened for limited hours.

We are still looking for better quotation. Please contact us should you have any ideas to help us cut cost.

康樂花園1月10竊案

疑遭兩批不同匪徒“相中”‧康樂花園1月10竊案
雪隆 2010-08-29 10:49
康樂花園治安敗壞,居民無不憂心忡忡。

(吉隆坡)康樂花園劫匪和竊賊橫行;尤其是竊賊,大有大竊、小有小偷,導致居民人心惶惶。

過去一個月,康樂花園至少發生了10宗爆竊事件,有人還看見匪徒駕著名貴房車幹案,相信有兩批不同的匪徒“相中”此區。


4中東人佯裝顧客搶皮包

居民向前來巡視的馬華敦拉薩鎮區會主席周連瓊申訴時披露,週五(8月27日)此花園的東方茶餐室也遭遇劫案;4名佯裝顧客的中東人走入茶座四處張望並假裝點餐,在確定目標後,動手搶走一名正在用餐的女生皮包,迅速往外跑。
事主被嚇得驚慌失措不懂大喊,馬上追了上去,搶回皮包;但同行的另一名中東男子隨後又把皮包搶走,登上汽車揚長而去。
據目擊者之一,也是此茶室小販業者的黃富貴指出,匪黨共有5人,出來幹案者為三男一女,還有一名男子在匪車上等候。
由於附近學校林立,週末也有很多人在草場打球,人來人往,一般人會以為那裡很安全,可是附近一帶住宅區卻屢遭爆竊,使治安亮起紅燈。

常有人觀望住家動向
周連瓊說,居民申訴時常有人坐在校門外,往排屋的住家觀望,但他們卻分不清是等待孩子下課的家長或是圖謀不軌的賊群,以至十分苦惱。
這個月來此區發生了多起入屋盜竊的事件,而且匪徒手法純熟,不排除為同一幫人。而另一批匪徒則駕著本田轎車幹案,看來有兩個集團同時瞄中了康樂花園這塊“肥田”。


匪徒幹案手法純熟
他說,相信匪徒在幹案後拿走鎖頭及監視器材是為了避免留下證據,證明是一個具有規模及犯罪手法熟練的匪幫。
周連瓊說,此區治安敗壞已使人們活在恐懼當中;為此,他敦促居民多加小心並提防茶餐室的搶劫手法。另外,他也表示將向此區警局反映,要求增加巡邏次數。

居民談話


鄭福來:出門5分鐘就被爆竊
我住在這裡16年,近年來被爆竊了4次,有一次還與匪徒碰個正著。3週前的一週日中午,我剛出門5分鐘,家就再度遭到光顧,損失慘重。匪徒把監視器敲破,拆走警報及監視系統,回來時甚麼都沒有了,錢財及房車被偷,就連鎖頭也被拿走。
學校監視器拍到有兩男一女下車,穿著像上班族,然後進入我的家。那時候人來人往,也很多本地人在打球,卻沒人注意到住家入賊。他們就這樣大搖大擺進來,我的車也被駕走了!
過了幾天,鄰居也有同樣的遭遇。
報警了那麼多次,都沒有抓到人,我也不想報警了。


李先生:偷了車匙晚上再來偷車
有一天早上10時左右,我家裡入賊,我馬上報警。由於我的汽車複製鑰匙被偷,因此我擔心匪徒會再來,但警察告訴我匪徒晚上不會那麼大膽再度進屋。
當天晚上,我不敢睡覺,坐在大廳等候,怎知道在匪徒開動汽車引擎時我才發覺他進了屋。當時,我趕快按下電鈕嘗試把鐵柵門關掉,然而只聽見“砰”一聲,匪徒已開足馬力衝出柵門揚長而去。

黃富貴:匪徒恫言若報警就殺全家
曾經有屋主家被洗劫,寶馬和本田CRV都被駕走,匪徒還恫言說如果報警便要殺他全家,過後屋主報警後便連夜搬離這個區了。

劉志偉:溝渠蓋也被偷走
這區治安越來越差,不但附近住家時常被爆竊,就連我家門前蓋的兩個溝渠蓋也被一輛三輪摩哆車騎士偷走,這區的賊匪真是“大小通殺”。


蘇慶清:同一天三家人遭爆竊
Ahliman路這個月已經有幾間屋子被爆竊。此外,單是8月24日,Waras路和Sarjana路便是一天三家人遭爆竊。

梁先生:狗兒狂吠嚇走匪徒
上週有居民看見兩名摩哆車騎士爬入對面家,幸好當時有兩隻狗狂吠,才把他們嚇走。

星洲日報/大都會‧2010.08.28

SAFETY over Inconvenience

Robbery undisclosed

During the survey we found out that few robbery cases did not reported:

Aug 2010: Desa Aman foodcourt: Robber with weapon forced open a car and chop the driver. The driver (oldman) still in ICU.

July 2010: No. 78 Jalan 8: Afternoon: Few robbers with weapon enter the house and tied up 2 old couples. The couples subsequently shifted out.

June 2010: Jalan 3: (owner ask not to disclose address): morning: 2 robbers enter the house and tied up 1 housewife.

Mar 2010: No.44 Jalan 9: 6am-7am: 4 robbers with weapon enter a house with kids still sleeping. It tooks just 20 minutes to take away most valuable things. The family subsequently moved out.

Please let us know more cases by dropping email or call us. 

51% agreement needed


From our initial survey, we are having about 60%-70% support. After minus vacant house/rented house of about 20%, the feedback is a very strong indication that our residents fully support the idea of having security in our Taman.

Saturday, 28 August 2010

Security option Survey

Thank you for all house representatives on visiting every house to distribute survey forms and answer all sort of questions from house owners.

We are, however, not getting a full response due to many owners not at home. We do drop the form into the letter box but just in case, those not yet receive any form please call Mr. Hassan (012-2315533), Ch'ng (010-2666160) or Thong (012-2210236).

Meetings on 28th Aug 2010


Discussions covered costs of security and fencing issues. With the enlarged team of representatives, the survey forms will be distributed to everyone in the Taman to make sure majority is agreed before proceed to engage security and building fences.